Yet another "get tough on illegal immigrants" guy goes over the edge.Why can't they ever stick with the issue that works?Tom Tancredo did the same thing: I defended both of them, saying that being in favor of strong borders does not make a person a racist wacko.And then Tancredo went crazy about the Congressional Black Caucus and a 100 other off-topic issues, and now this guy decides to single handedly get to the bottom of the Obama birth certificate issue. It's disappointing that they make themselves look so crazy.
Fake, but accurate.U.K.L. Lee
Have you bothered to look at the evidence? Probably not if you support Obama. The evidence of forged documents is compelling.
I'll say one thing for Sheriff Joe, he's persistent.Heads will roll when he proves he's right.
How long will it be before he starts wearing hats made of aluminum foil?
Joe Arpario would make a great president for USA just think of all the money we could save getting rid of the messicans and most of the non working niggers on gov assitance. Obamm is a plant by ?? I'm not even sure we will ever find out until he brings the USA down.
One angry dude, really gets off on the power of his position. I predict he will fall hard.
Really 4:02, you think some chickenshit county Sheriff from Arizona is going to take down the President?
Too bad they didn't build windmills in Arizona before they elected this guy. Next thing you know, he'll be looking for a duck to so he can weigh Obama.
How we let an illegal alien become President is beyond belief.
The evidence is overwhelming that the document was forged. That was out before Sheriff Joe looked at it. It is a worst job than the document that got Dan Rather fired. Barry, you will stick with the fraud no matter what the evidence. It is a sad day for this country when the obvious is ignored. It is Chicago style politics gone nationwide.
"One angry dude, really gets off on the power of his position. I predict he will fall hard." 4:45 PMI agree, President Flop Ears is one and done.
5:57Once again, you bare your ignorant ass in public.The original document exists in the State of Hawaii birth certificate records. On paper. ANY electronic copy, repeat, and please read slowly, ANY electronic copy can be altered, including copies where people want you to believe the document has been altered.
Like everything else in this country, the presidency is up for sale. The last time around, the Muslims were the high bidders so we get the Kenyan Candidate and the end of America as we know it. And you think that's crazy? Look around you. What's not crazy these days? In the name of equality we've given our country away. On top of it all, I agree with Barry in that Obama is likely to be re-elected or rather, re-instituted. Look for massive voter fraud. Invest in canned goods.
its official, i truly hate this blog now, spud kennedy, gordon keith, ritchie whitt wanna be..pathetic..see ya i hate liberals tune into gordos corner at 630 and you have the blog content
Hey, genius, get it right: It's the "Observation Deck" at 6:30, "Muse in the News" at 7:10, and "Gordo's Corner" at 9:??. And the most interesting stories of the day should never be repeated by more than one person. Dumb arse.Oh, one more thing, "Bless your heart."
I agree, the slick talking lawyer will get re-elected. I have never seen such a charismatic arrogant professional politician in my 57 years. Liberal is one thing, Marxist is another. God help the future generations.
Would you liberals please give me some good reasons to vote for Obama's re-election. I'm serious, am I missing something? Maybe I'm mis-informed. I'm not going to argue with anyone, just be honest and help me out here.
6:56, you reveal your low IQ. The document released by Obama is a forgery.
Sheriff Joe is an idiot, dumb Cracker
Sheriff Joe is a bigger Quack than Big Mex
Big Tex is a restroom republican who writes "Obama sucks" on the stall at Love truck stops.
Sheriff Joe for president.
9:06 we all do that. Give me one good reason you don't think he sucks as president?
The "you liberals" might be a good reason not to bother.
If the top TeaBagger birther and 20 document forgery experts were flown to Hiawii and viewed, studied, and tested the actual birth certificate, and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt it was real, the BaggerBirthers still would not believe it. Ho Hum and yawn. We can just wait for the Sheriff of Nothingham to bring down Obama. It is coming.
He is cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.
Even if he was.......Rules for U. S. Citizenship when born in a foreign country.When one parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national, the US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of 14. An exception for people serving in the military was created by considering time spent outside the US on military duty as time spent in the US.While there were initially rules regarding what the child must do to retain citizenship, amendments since 1952 have eliminated these requirements.
Barry you have your head stuck so far down in the sand that you can't even entertain the idea of a forgery. He was never properly vetted as a candidate. If he were a Republican he would have been crucified, but because he is a black Democrat (marxist)no one could say a word against him for fear of being called a racist.
Come on people, whether you are Democrat or Republican, you certainly agree:1) There are plenty of very intelligent, educated, and able lawyers who are Republican;2) The Birth Certificate issue has been on the radar for 5+ years; and3) Highly trained investigators that know what they are doing have looked at this issue in great detail.Yet, no credible source has made any real headway in proving any sort of sham, forgery or otherwise.Why in the world would you believe that Sheriff Joe now has a smoking gun?
I am consistently amazed how many experts there are on the more complex aspects of immigration law and the Constitution. They are just cruising around the internet, offering up their wisdom for free!Out here int eh real world, i can't even find anyone who knows how to get the copy machine un-jammed, but here there are immigration and Constitution experts EVERYWHERE, apparently.
Can we trade Tom bishop for sherriff Joe?
8:37, There has been no admendent to the Constitution changing what the founding fathers believed to be and was the universal standard for a Natural Born Citizen that was written into the original document. They all read it and it was standard reading for law school students when the Constitution was drafted. I will not provide you the title or author of the book that I speak of. You are so smart about the Constitution I am sure you have read it and know what book I speak of.
8:40 pmIf that is the way you feel, call the local FBI office and report the crime.
I'm still waiting...Would you liberals please give me some good reasons to vote for Obama's re-election. I'm serious, am I missing something? Maybe I'm mis-informed. I'm not going to argue with anyone, just be honest and help me out here.
Katy,I don't have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.
We need him in Runaway Bay. Hes a real peace officer not like the Barneys we have here now.
Sheriff Joe...Go to Washington...Take over the government...Lock down the borders...Eliminate democracy...Nuke the Middle East...Damn the torpedoes...full speed ahead.Double Fake My Favorite Martian
9:31, 8:37 here;You refer toThe qualifications for president are set in Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution: "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States."The law I quoted in my original post says that child is a natural born citizen. Check it out for yourself.
10:59, These are the words: "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President... The exemption for citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution was put there because the day prior to the adoption there no United States of America to be a citizen of. The first few Presidents were born British subjects. Those born after that date had to be natural born. Prior to the ratification of the Constitution the closest reference we have to Natural Born Citizen is from the legal treatise “Law of Nations,” written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. The Naturalization Act of 1790 established Natural Born Citizenship for children born beyond the seas of Citizens of the United States. Please note that "citizens" as written in this law is plural, indicating both mother and father must be citizens.This law of 1790 was superseded by The Naturalization Act of 1795 and Natural Born was not mentioned in the newer law.This will make for good reading and study.Most of the founding fathers read and possessed copies of "Laws of Nations".
1:57How dense are you?Article II, section 1 says "natural born citizen". The law I quoted in my original post says that child is a natural born citizen.Let's see if we have a match....hmmmm....I think it is "natural born citizen."This law is for those born between 1952 and 1986, again, I ask you to LOOK IT UP. Google it and you will find a dozen sources. It is changes after 1986 and requires even less time for the one U. S, parent to reside in the U. S. after the age of 14.
11:39, I am trying to follow you: "amendments since 1952 have eliminated these requirements". Which one of the 27 amendments to the Constitution are you referring to?
3;59I will try one more time. We both know what the section II, article 1 says. Only a natural born citizen can become president.There are laws (not amnendments to the contitution) that define a natural born citizen.Here are the laws concerning a child born to a U. S. citizen and an alien when the birth takes place outside of the U. S. and its territories. The ABC’s of Immigration: Citizenship Rules for People Born Outside the United States What are the rules for people born between May 24, 1934 and January 13, 1941?In 1934, Congress passed a law allowing US citizen parents, regardless of their gender, to pass citizenship to their children born abroad. If both parents were citizens, only one was required to have resided in the US, and as with the previous law, there was no required length of time that the parent must have resided in the US. However, if one parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national, the child would lose their citizenship if they did not either reside in the US for the five years immediately prior to their eighteenth birthday or, within six months of turning 21, take an oath of allegiance to the US. These requirements were gradually relaxed between 1934 and 1940.Illegitimate children born aboard between 1934 and 1941 became citizens under the general provision, and because the child was considered to have only one parent, no requirements were imposed that could result in the loss of citizenship.What are the rules for people born between January 14, 1941 and December 23, 1952?As before, children born abroad to two US citizens, with one parent having resided in the US, the child was a US citizen at birth. No further action was required to maintain citizenship.When one parent was a citizen and the other a foreign national, however, the rules changed substantially. To pass citizenship, the citizen parent must have resided in the US for at least 10 years before the birth of the child, and at least five of those years had to be after the parent turned 16. Because this rule made it impossible for parents under 21 to pass citizenship, in 1946 the requirement was amended to create an exception for parents who had served in World War Two. Originally, for children born during this period to retain US citizenship, they had to reside in the US for five years between the age of 13 and 21. However, an exception was made for children of US citizens who were employed abroad by the US government or a US company.Children born out of wedlock to a US citizen mother who met the residence requirements were automatically citizens, and they retained US citizenship even if legitimated by the foreign national father. For a child born out of wedlock to a US citizen father, to obtain US citizenship the child must have been legitimated before the age of 21. What are the rules for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986?Again, children born abroad to two US citizen parents were US citizens at birth, as long as one of the parents resided in the US at some point before the birth of the child.When one parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national, the US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of 14. An exception for people serving in the military was created by considering time spent outside the US on military duty as time spent in the US.While there were initially rules regarding what the child must do to retain citizenship, amendments since 1952 have eliminated these requirements. .
I don't think you see the picture. There are more than one class of citizens. The Supreme Court addressed this in Minor vs. Happersett when in it's ruling it wrote: "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens." Again the word is "parents". It is a plural word meaning both mother and father. The Court did not write "one of the parents". I am a citizen because I was born in the U.S. I am not a natural born citizen because my mother was Canadian.
I just quoted you the law, you can say parent, parents, plural what ever, the law is clear. I give up on getting you to read that.
Just an FYI...John McCain was born at the Coco Solo Naval Air Station, Panama Canal Zone.11:13 might want to rationalize that one.
5:30, I know the law. I studied it and this is why McCain was qualified: "And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens". Note that it says "children of citizens" in the plural form and the term "natural born" is used. I am not the child of citizens of the U.S. I am the child of a citizen of the United States and of a citizen of Canada. Therefore I am not a natural born citizen.
Post a Comment