blank'/> Liberally Lean From The Land Of Dairy Queen: The Rumor Is . . .

3.07.2006

The Rumor Is . . .

. . . that the biggest fraud in music history is pregnant again.

12 comments:

miz.gina said...

I always thought she looked like a brood mare...

But I guess if we aren't paying for them then we can't really gripe about how many she has. We can just feel sorry for the kids.

mischief said...

Just what the world needs more like her. We can only hope the kids get to spend more time with a nanny than they have to spend with Britney.

Anonymous said...

whore

Anonymous said...

Step away from the HoHo's and Creme soda's now!

Anonymous said...

Excellent. She looks great. Tighten up the pants a bit. Get one of those excellent redneck hairdo's with the dark under the blonde. Now we are talking hot. Maybe she'll do porn....

Anonymous said...

I love to see the ones who take pot shots b/c they can't be her. Its amazing. She has really never done anything too bad. Maybe the driving with the baby in the front seat but excluding that. She is all that and you girls don't have a chance, so lets play bash Brit.

Anonymous said...

Her involvement in entertainment is enough.... thumbs down, feed her to the lions.

Anonymous said...

What a bunch of mean spirited hypocrites. And the irony is, I'll bet she looks better in this picture than ALL of the 7 people who have posted, including me. Whore? How in the world would 7:51 know? She may have poor taste in men, and made some pretty stupid decisions with her child, but give her credit--whether you think she has talent or not, she was smart enough and determined enough to convince some studio execs and alot of the under 20 population she's got talent. Most of you seven would LOVE to either be her or married to her with her lifestyle. Get real.

Anonymous said...

Pretty is as pretty does. I'll aadmit that the whore comment was totally inappropriate, 7:51. Who cares if she's pregnant or not. I wouldn't want to be her or have her life. I just think that if you're talented, you don't have to dress or act the way she does. That's just my opinion. Either way, we don't have to be so cruel.

mischief said...

Ahem...6:56 With your astonishing gift of near super human deductive reasoning and an unparalleled understanding of human nature I would imagine you would be far too busy solving crimes for the FBI while establishing world peace to have the time to chastise people you assume are petty, morally bankrupt as well as hideously unattractive.

A few hints for you of such mighty assumptions. Just because people criticize another person they believe has behaved in a manner with which they disagree does not mean they are envious and would trade their “lifestyle” for that of the person they perceive as substandard. Your statements make it seem as though you are of the impression that people who are well educated, happily married, living a healthful lifestyle as well as having successfully raised a child without endangering said child’s life feel inferior to some blubbery pooped out pop tart who while surrounded by a horde of handlers is unable to maintain an image other than that of a trashy hillbilly who has less sense and personal pride than that of a may fly during mating season.

You are more than welcome to hold Britney in the highest esteem and are well within your rights to fantasize about living her “lifestyle” and having tongue wrestled Madonna. However, your eagerness to vilify people who endeavor to voice an opinion other than yours makes it easy to see how Britney Spears would be someone you respect and admire.

FYI, even on my worst day I have NEVER looked as grotesquely unkempt or porky as Britney does in that picture.

Anonymous said...

Mischief, you can't read. No where in 6;56's post does he or she say they admire and respect Spears. I agree with 6:56. I guess its OK for mischief to vilify 6:56 for stating his or her opinions, but the same rules obviously do not apply to mischief. Great use of big words, mischief, and an outstanding example that overinflated egos are not confined to Hollywood.

mischief said...

8:02 Clearly you have difficulty comprehending the meaning of the words within the content of the comment made at 6:56 as well as mine at 11:50. 6:56 posting a remark such as "...but give her credit--whether you think she has talent or not, she was smart enough and determined enough to convince some studio execs and a lot of the under 20 population she's got talent. Most of you seven would LOVE to either be her or married to her with her lifestyle." indicates some level of admiration and respect for Britney Spears. Admiration is indicated in the comment that Britney's lifestyle is so spectacular that others would aspire to the same lifestyle. Respect for Britney is indicated by declaring that she may be a fraud but she was able to pull the wool over the eyes of powerful people as well as millions of young people.

I did not criticize 6:56 for having a differing opinion than anyone. I actually acknowledged their right to their opinion. What I found reprehensible as well as outrageous was that 6:56 felt comfortable assuming knowledge of the physical characteristics as well as the psyches of people who held opinions different than those of 6:56. Thus is the reason I elected to use sarcasm to ridicule the ridiculousness of assuming and projecting things onto people who merely stated their opinions.

I always find it laughable when someone faults another person for having too much ego and/or intellect because they use "big words"! Thanks for the laugh!

8:02 did you graduate from a public high school? (Please notice I asked a question and did not assume you graduated from a public high school.)