The kid in the picture is reportedly 3 years old. At what age would the kid have to be for this picture to go from "acceptable" to "unacceptable"? (Of course, some might already label it unacceptable.) Somewhere around puberty? Earlier? Later?
I find it frustrating that we see similar extremism in parenting literature that we see in politics. I find the approaches of both Sears and Ferber to be worthless in their practical application. Yet, they are the two "gurus" of parenting, each with huge followings and dozens of publications.
Much like politics, the extremes in parenting make all the noise and claim that the answers are easy if you just accept their extremist viewpoint. Yet in real world application, each is blind to any evidence that contradicts their opinion and each completely fails to even comprehend what the other is trying to accomplish.
Our society seems to have little use for the people in the middle, trying to do what's best by balancing the pros and cons of the extremes they are presented. Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised.
You have no problem letting the "N" word go through on the comments but you have an issue with showing a kid breast feeding? Keep on pushing that button for more site hits BG.
Please elaborate on why that is disturbing. Are you talking about a certain age and still breast feeding, or are your talking about breast feeding in general?
A little breast feeding history: The late oil & gas icon, H. L. Hunt, was the youngest of a large family. He was nursed by his mother until the age of 7. Strange but true.
To those who don't like this cover, or the idea of breastfeeding past infant stage...you are ALL here because this went on in your family history for thousands of years. You are also ALL here because you were not aborted, and you are also ALL here because man parts and women parts got mixed; and not because man and man parts were mixed, or women and women parts. There are not exceptions to these statements.
Good for her! It's not unacceptable - it's completely natural. Breastfeeding has been around forever. How many thousands of years later, and people are STILL complaining about it?! Grow up - it's just a boob!
Next thing she'll be wanting is her kid to rub some Sun Tan lotion on her while a little bead of sweat slowly drips down her moist forehead or somethin.
1:38 - I said it's disturbing because I know many women who do this for sexual pleasure and a feeling of being needed. It's sickening! Once they get teeth, it's time to wean!
You guys act like 13 year old boys. It is proper in many other countries and cultures around the world to breast feed until the child is 3, 4, or 5. If she wants to continue to breast feed, why should you even care?
Oh, wait, I finally got why you were uncomfortable with it: You're worried about the legal liabilities if the child were to fall off of the step ladder due to being distracted by the photographer. Because, I've been way more uncomfortable with the T&A you have on this webpage vs. what is being shown in Time. Oh no! A breast is being used for it's actual biological purpose--shock.
I saw the entire on the Today Show this morning. What's your problem, Barry? You show and print all kinds of trash on here but, you act self righteous and can't print this picture.
I don't think anyone would have a problem with women like that who breastfeed in public. It's those Wal-Mart white trash fatties who breastfeed in public. These folks we cannot stand to look at - even with their oversized Minnie Mouse shirts on.
To be on the cover of a magazine in that stance with your 3 year old child breast feeding is weird. Seems the mother has some sort of warped need. I don't think the child will like being bullied about being on a national cover in a few years either.
The deal is this.....Time Mag does not care one bit about the topic, or the woman, it's about getting people to read their trashy magazine.....did we just discover breast or something.....next issue they will invent a man having an abortion......second, it's a moms personal decision, not public....which Time has managed to make public for...bingo...magazine sales!
10:34- Just be glad they are not nursing some queer father. I read where queers were taking female hormone shots, so they could produce milk to feed their adopted babies. Now thats sick!
.jpg)
73 comments:
Some people may find this very titillating..
i envy that kid
I can't show all of it. Well,at least not at one time.
Lucky kid.
Rage
The world has gone crazy!
These are the kids that occupying everything. They all need to be weened off the tit, in one form or another.
I still get a little embarassed when I breastfeed in public, but I think it's because I'm 40.
LOVE ME SOME BOOBIE!!!
The kid in the picture is reportedly 3 years old. At what age would the kid have to be for this picture to go from "acceptable" to "unacceptable"? (Of course, some might already label it unacceptable.) Somewhere around puberty? Earlier? Later?
Racy. I hate the word racy and I don't know why.
This is strangely arousing to me.
If a step stool is NOT your first sign that your kid needs to be weaned!?....I dont know what is!?
I'm thirsty, where do you get in line for a taste of that?
Hmmmmm...this makes me want cookies.
11:38 At 3 yrs. old it is UNACCEPTABLE.
The pussification of America on full display.
She is hot. That is my political stance
I find it frustrating that we see similar extremism in parenting literature that we see in politics. I find the approaches of both Sears and Ferber to be worthless in their practical application. Yet, they are the two "gurus" of parenting, each with huge followings and dozens of publications.
Much like politics, the extremes in parenting make all the noise and claim that the answers are easy if you just accept their extremist viewpoint. Yet in real world application, each is blind to any evidence that contradicts their opinion and each completely fails to even comprehend what the other is trying to accomplish.
Our society seems to have little use for the people in the middle, trying to do what's best by balancing the pros and cons of the extremes they are presented. Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised.
I'll have what he's having, please.
I think women who allow that are disturbing!
You have no problem letting the "N" word go through on the comments but you have an issue with showing a kid breast feeding?
Keep on pushing that button for more site hits BG.
Surely there is something in Leviticus to handle right/wrong on this one...yes?
I'm kind of retracting my earlier statement. I don't think I'd want any of that. Maybe just a touch in my coffee, but not a full-on taste.
Rage
1:26
Please elaborate on why that is disturbing. Are you talking about a certain age and still breast feeding, or are your talking about breast feeding in general?
This is crazy. The P.C. police tell us we need to raise boys like they are broken little girls.
Hey kid....
I'll give you $20 to trade places with you.
A little breast feeding history: The late oil & gas icon, H. L. Hunt, was the youngest of a large family. He was nursed by his mother until the age of 7. Strange but true.
My Other Brother Darryl
To those who don't like this cover, or the idea of breastfeeding past infant stage...you are ALL here because this went on in your family history for thousands of years. You are also ALL here because you were not aborted, and you are also ALL here because man parts and women parts got mixed; and not because man and man parts were mixed, or women and women parts. There are not exceptions to these statements.
Good for her! It's not unacceptable - it's completely natural. Breastfeeding has been around forever. How many thousands of years later, and people are STILL complaining about it?! Grow up - it's just a boob!
2:12 Nobody is complaining about breastfeeding. DUH. They are complaining at the age of the child.
Mmmm...somebody needs to grow up them-self.
Sweeeeet Condensed Milk..I always said
I think he should be checking the water while working on the knobs
Hey LL, with your obsession/fixation with that part of the female anatomy you probably already have it blown up to life size and mounted on your wall.
Surely, this mother is not extorting her child in a pornographic way on the cover of Time for money.
Boy Mr. Barry, you really can stir up wise county....you should charge a nickel a post! Lets do an IPO!
2:23 and a stool below it too! LOL
Next thing she'll be wanting is her kid to rub some Sun Tan lotion on her while a little bead of sweat slowly drips down her moist forehead or somethin.
This is how it all starts.
stfu wiggins...dont be a hater just because your blog is an uninteresting, boring, put u to sleep piece of crap. You effin douche.
formula is better for babies anyway.
That kid will probably be a little uncomfortable when he is 20 years old and sees that picture.
I'm sorry but, if you're still breast feeding your kid at 3 yrs. of age it's no longer for the kid, it's for your sick twisted pleasure period.
Well, I'm shocked! Shocked I tell ya!
Why didn't they put daddy on the other breast and make it a family portrait?
I haven't read Grapes of Wrath since high school, but wasn't there a passage involving an adult man breastfeeding off another woman?
Friends episode - the one with Susan's breast milk (or whatever they called it)
Ross: "C'mon, guys. That is the most beautiful, natural thing in the world."
Joey: "Yeeaah, but there's a kid attached to it!"
Come rub some lotion on Mommie where it hurts baby doll.
Standing on a stool suck'n yo momma's teet is a problem, RIGHT?
OH MY GOSH!
1:38 - I said it's disturbing because I know many women who do this for sexual pleasure and a feeling of being needed. It's sickening! Once they get teeth, it's time to wean!
Ross: "C'mon, guys. That is the most beautiful, natural thing in the world."
Joey: "Yeeaah, but there's a kid attached to it!"
3:57 PM
Greatness!!
If that kid is 3 I wanna know what momma has been eating, vials of Deca-Durabolin.
If your a liberal the appropriate age to stop is 42, conservertive it is 12 months.
You guys act like 13 year old boys. It is proper in many other countries and cultures around the world to breast feed until the child is 3, 4, or 5. If she wants to continue to breast feed, why should you even care?
4:33 Cuz we're not in some dumb-ass infested country...unless Obama gets his way.
I object because it is in the media and I consider it porn.
The next visit to the doctors office waiting room will be interesting.
Oh, wait, I finally got why you were uncomfortable with it: You're worried about the legal liabilities if the child were to fall off of the step ladder due to being distracted by the photographer. Because, I've been way more uncomfortable with the T&A you have on this webpage vs. what is being shown in Time. Oh no! A breast is being used for it's actual biological purpose--shock.
I saw the entire on the Today Show this morning. What's your problem, Barry? You show and print all kinds of trash on here but, you act self righteous and can't print this picture.
I don't think anyone would have a problem with women like that who breastfeed in public. It's those Wal-Mart white trash fatties who breastfeed in public. These folks we cannot stand to look at - even with their oversized Minnie Mouse shirts on.
The Backdoor Intruder
You show girls with their tits hanging out daily but this makes you uncomfortable?
1. Your priorities are warped.
2. you are acting like a titty baby.
Hell I'm over 50 and i still like it. I hate that they made me stop when I was young but I'm making up for lost time!!!
This whole post really sucks! He,he, get it? sucks :)
To be on the cover of a magazine in that stance with your 3 year old child breast feeding is weird. Seems the mother has some sort of warped need. I don't think the child will like being bullied about being on a national cover in a few years either.
First, even in African nations breastfeeding stops for the toddler.
Second, even cows and horses wean their young once teeth begin to develop.
Breastfeeding is natural, but so is weaning.
The deal is this.....Time Mag does not care one bit about the topic, or the woman, it's about getting people to read their trashy magazine.....did we just discover breast or something.....next issue they will invent a man having an abortion......second, it's a moms personal decision, not public....which Time has managed to make public for...bingo...magazine sales!
That child is one month away from being 4 yrs. old.
That mother is sick in the head.
Attachment my butt.
9:28 You are kidding, right?
The women Barry posts have their boobies covered somewhat. This sick twisted loser mother has an almost 4 yr. old posing while sucking her tit.
There might be a difference.
FUNBAGS!
Barry, I guess you would be more comfortable if it was a pic of a couple of fags having sex.
Now thats sick!
The kid in the pic is 4 and the woman also 'nurses' his OLDER brother!
What's next? Sex with the teacher.
Not good if you're home-schooled.
10:34- Just be glad they are not nursing some queer father. I read where queers were taking female hormone shots, so they could produce milk to feed their adopted babies. Now thats sick!
http://discovermagazine.com/1995/feb/fathersmilk468
Is the kid a latchter
I bet she is a pre-school teacher. Just sayin!
Rickey Vaughn for school board!
BG, Isn't about time to just edit out all big tex idiocies? What a roaring jerk! Even WK makes sense now and then. Ban tex.
Post a Comment