.jpg)
The Messenger just concluded a series of stories on people (my description, not theirs), and one of them was about this guy who sees a mystery around every corner. I just glanced at the article and one sentence really jumped out at me. They "all tell" the same story? Really? Over 100 people saw one event and they "all" describe it the same way?
Not. A. Chance.
17 comments:
What are you disclaiming? That Messenger thinks it's a series of stores, or that Messenger considers them people?
You.Are.Correct.Counselor. Hell there are HUNDREDS of different stories from the people in Dealy Plaza that day. And you correctly note, or imply, that there will NEVER be all the same stories from multiple witnesses to the same event. That's just the way the human brain works differently in different people.
This guy can't get a break.
His wife was my favorite teacher in high school!
Some take the Bible at it's word. Every single word ......Literally
My Grammie tells a different story. And so sis her boss, who died in a single car wreck the next day.
Rage
Jim Marrs, what a nut. From the Kennedy assassination to 9/11 to alien abductions he's cornered the market on nutballery.
Vince Bugliosi says, "Here, everything pointed toward Oswald’s guilt. All the physical evidence, all the scientific evidence. Everything he said, everything he did. In Reclaiming History, at the end of book one, I set forth 53 separate pieces of evidence pointing toward Oswald’s guilt. It would not be humanly possible for this man to be innocent and still have 53 pieces of evidence pointing toward his guilt. Only in a fantasy world can you have 53 pieces of evidence pointing toward guilt and still be innocent.
Quickly, five pieces: Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was the murder weapon. That’s pretty heavy by itself. Oswald was the only employee at the Book Depository Building who fled the building after the assassination. Forty-five minutes later, he shoots and kills Officer J. D. Tippit, Dallas Police Department. That murder bore the signature of a man in desperate flight from some awful deed. Thirty minutes later at a Texas theatre he resists arrest, pulls a gun on the arresting officer. During his interrogation, [Oswald] told one provable lie after another, showing a consciousness of guilt."
Read his book on the Kennedy murder if you've ever been curious and especially if you are silly enough to believe in a conspiracy.
A related post several months ago about a Dallas police officer in trouble, that had ties to Wise County. It was his daughter if I am not mistaken. Whatever happened in that case?
Big Ed
Jim Marrs is a hottie. He can conspiracy my theory any day.
Rage
Faux Rage -
Boring.
Your posts are as tired & repetitive as the guy that does the "drugs and alcohol involved?" bit. Or maybe you ARE that guy.
Move on to another bit.
How many different pieces of factual evidence point at Jesus being the Son of God..............but people don't believe that either.
Right on 1:57 PM--ABC did an exhaustive rehash of the whole incident some years back--seems lots of the "facts" that supported a conspiracy were not correct--they assumed things that were not so--and they trotted out proof of it for everyone to see for themselves (Connally's jump seat making him sit NOT directly in line with Kennedy, the motorcycle cop's supposed location NOT correct for the timing of the shots and the echoes, etc.). It all added up to the conclusion that Oswald did it alone.
The most thought-provoking and accurate psychological statement I've heard repeated (and if you just examine yourselves honestly you'll have to agree)--we just don't want to believe that a lone, deranged, antisocial idiot could be successful in taking out such an influential, important person--we actually WANT there to be a conspiracy in order to FEEL better about it. Unfortunately, most senseless acts of violence are just that--senseless and stupid.
Read THE KENNEDY DETAIL by Gerald Blaine (one of the Secret Service men on Kennedy's detail), and you will see how our country was ripe for a presidential assassination--insistence on open top cars, very little budget for manpower and technology, lack of communication between the law enforcement agencies that we take for granted today, etc. It was bound to happen.
As for it being unbelievable because Oswald was alone--just talk to ANYONE in the security field and they'll tell you that the lone nutcase is the hardest to plan for yet alone stop, and the most dangerous.
Factual? Like what?
Jim Marrs is an idiot who has made a very good living off the imbicility of others.
OK, maybe he's a genius making a living off others gullibility, but he's still wrong as two boys slammin' hams in a pup tent.
He even looks like a dimwit.
Sit and talk with him for a few minutes and you will be convinced he's not a dimwit or an idiot. Too many demoncrats around here for me.
Post a Comment