The Dallas Morning News has run a couple of stories on the 10 year anniversary of the killing of Darlie Routier's two boys.
Some have said the Rowlett PD rushed to judgment in the case. Well, this new quote from one of the stories doesn't help quiet those concerns:
"She got released from the hospital that Saturday, and when she came by [the police station], she was laughing and joking," Lt. Nabors said. "At this point, I already knew she did it. So I got a little graphic describing the boys to see what kind of response I could get out of her. She said, 'I know this must be hard on y'all.' She never shed a tear. At all."
More than you ever wanted to know about the case, from a slightly biased point of view, can be found at www.fordarlieroutier.org/ including the complete 911 tape.
.jpg)
6.05.2006
Justice?
The Dallas Morning News has run a couple of stories on the 10 year anniversary of the killing of Darlie Routier's two boys.
Some have said the Rowlett PD rushed to judgment in the case. Well, this new quote from one of the stories doesn't help quiet those concerns:
"She got released from the hospital that Saturday, and when she came by [the police station], she was laughing and joking," Lt. Nabors said. "At this point, I already knew she did it. So I got a little graphic describing the boys to see what kind of response I could get out of her. She said, 'I know this must be hard on y'all.' She never shed a tear. At all."
More than you ever wanted to know about the case, from a slightly biased point of view, can be found at www.fordarlieroutier.org/ including the complete 911 tape.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Justice? Not at all! Read it, understand it, do your own investigation and you will come to the same conclusion.
When is the fry date?
C'mon Reagan, do you know anything about this case? or just what the Media has "told" you?
Whew!! I just combed through the link...I don't think I could sit on the jury for this case. Stranger things have happened, but the bruises on her arms..my god, even in a struggle - no yelling? her husband didn't hear the glass coffee table break? I just don't get it. If it was a crime for greed, who now has the life insurance money? Her husband? And where is he right now?
What does Judge Francis have to lose by releasing the evidence? He should release it. Seems to me the evidence in question,if tested,would prove who's right or wrong.
Why did she continue to change her story if the bitch is innocent. Fry her ass!!!!!
Post a Comment