Messenger's Joe Duty Not Shooting A Christmas Card Photo Of Defendant
60 years in prison. No parole for Continuous Sexual Abuse under Texas Law. Defendant is 44 years old.
(Live from courtroom)
.jpg)
12.13.2012
Punishment Verdict In Wise County Case
60 years in prison. No parole for Continuous Sexual Abuse under Texas Law. Defendant is 44 years old.
(Live from courtroom)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
He got screwed...ahh maybe I shouldn't put it that way.
HE IS GETTING BETTER THAN HE DESERVES.NO TOLERANCE FOR ANYONE WHO WOUND ABUSE A CHILD.
Justice!
Who knows, he just might like what he gets when her drops the soap.
I TOTALLY agree with Andy and hope this establishes what juries will ALWAYS do for such disgusting crimes. I don't even have much respect for those who defend such sickos.
Good for that jury!!!!
I'm curious as to what you predicted yesterday. You never said.
He didnt. Trust me. I have it on good authority that the jury carefully considered the case. And the sentence.
Sincerely,
One of the Twelve
Joe! What's up with that hat? You need a hair cut!
If you see Jerry Sandusky, tell him I said hello.
I wonder, how do we know she told the truth..wonder if there was proof or did he admit it or because two other girls said he molested them too?
This is why I don't babysit kids..afraid of being accused of something..
60 yrs...hope he was guilty.
People who wear moon caps look like child molesters.
He should have been found Guilty just on Belew's haircut alone
All evidence brought forward by the prosecution painted the victim in a positive light. The counter argument of the defense. "Everybody lies." But nothing was brought forward by the defense to give reason to doubt the victims' testimony or their credibility of the witnesses.
Nothing was said about whether there where any disagreements between child and perp, between mother and perp, only "couldn't it be possible?"
The charge was not to find guilty beyond all possible doubt, but all reasonable doubt. And there was no reason, as I stated, to doubt the testimony given.
i bet he don't ever do that again..
You're all assuming he is guilty, how very odd.
Post a Comment