That forensics testimony is crap--depending on the actual bullets used. NATO (and similar) rounds are specifically designed not to fragment. Rage
sounds like a similar family's "story" about cops and demons chasing a "victim". always the fault of someone else.
As much as I hate to agree with Rage, he is right. Most people purchase the cheap full metal jacket rounds for AR's. They will go right through you....and whatever is behind you.
Rage: Unless you have insight into the specific round used you can not generalize. While your statement about NATO and similar rounds is true, fragmentary rounds for the AR-15 are easily obtainable in either a .223 or 5.56 round. I have clips full of both types. I use FMJ for target rounds but fragmentary rounds for hunting.
Notice--everybody involved all boozed up--go ol' alkyhol!
11:32, give me a break. Your average yay-hoo isn't going to buy anything but the cheapest. Or whatever came with the gun when he stole it. 99% of the rounds purchased and used, especially when defending your crack house, are FMJs.And if the guy was about nine feet away? The bullet wouldn't have time to so much as tumble (which NATO rounds will do at longer ranges). It would make a .223-sized hole through the guy, the wall, the next wall, and out the back of the house, most likely. NATO rounds are actually intended to create survivable wounds.Rage
Also, only a sissy hunts with a .223.Rage
And another!http://www.gazette.com/articles/school-125186-member-board.htmlBut this one is different--the milfy woman is on the school board!
Not your average murder case. I can see how a jury might have some trouble with it. I predict a lesser conviction assuming the jury has that option.
Rage, a .223 is a great coyote/varmint round. Nothing sissy about using the correct round for the job.
Devil, only redneck sissies hunt coyotes and varmints. You're probably the kind of asshole who shoots peoples' livestock in the night, and never owns up to it.Rage
Rage: why is it that anytime someone tries to have a conversation with you, you insult them and are reduced to schoolyard taunts? I suppose I could stoop to your level...I know you are but what am I? But I will simply let it go knowing your history of continually attacking reasonable people. After all, how could I insult someone as intelligent as you oh wise collegiate? Those 4 doctoral degrees are paying off well.
Were the greasy damned Messkins illegals?
why is it that anytime someone tries to have a conversation with you, you insult them and are reduced to schoolyard taunts?...After all, how could I insult someone as intelligent as you oh wise collegiate? Those 4 doctoral degrees are paying off well.?I suppose I could stoop to your level...I know you are but what am I?I think the appropriate taunt to cover your particular brand of hypocrisy is "you started it."Rage
Consilium - Advice to live by. Pay particular attention to #3.
I started nothing, simply made a statement that you disagreed with, listened to your childish taunt, threw your typical BS about how educated you are back at you, and then awaited your next post. I anticipate your next response will be your tounge sticking out. Grow up and lose your piss poor attitude. Try to have a conversation once in awhile instead of just insulting everyone. We all get it. Your jaded and hate life and everyone.
Consilium, I wouldnt worry bout what that twatter Rage thinks. That limp-wristed snatch prolly can't even chamber a round. ♫
I call meth.
5:14 funny and true. WKyle: excellent advice and I will take it to heart. I already knew Rage was a troll but I believe in giving everyone a chance.
.223 is for sissies! Go 375 Ruger.
Thank God they weren't smoking pot. Somebody might have chilled out.
wordkyle calls Rage a troll because he's tired of Rage showing him how wrong he is and has decided to ignore him instead of respond. Mzchief did the exact same thing. Now Consilium will, after baring his ass like a baby. Y'all need to grow up.
I'd rather drop the fools one by one with a bow. You never even hear the destruction
6:22 It seems that every time someone takes Rage's side they are simply to weak minded to see a good argument. Or they are Rage. Same difference. I will certainly take to heart your comment to grow up. I agree. I should never have given in to the name calling started by Rage. My weakness. I appreciate your wise words. Grown up enough for you Mr. Anonymous?
every time someone takes Rage's side they are simply to weak minded to see a good argument.You've been posting here for what, a week? How would you know? (Hi The Secret Police, how are you?)Or they are Rage.Sorry, but I'm not the only one who agrees that the likes of you and wordkyle are weenies.OOPS! I called you a name.Grown up enough for you Mr. Anonymous?And you're not anonymous? Your name is funnier than the dude who jumped off the bridge.Rage
Post a Comment