Aren't you Jewish Barry?DF Eric Cartman
Hey Skippy, He crammed socialized medicine down our throats didn't he?
Arm, mobilize, and REVOLT!!!!
When the President is considering bypassing Congress to unilaterally restrict a fundamental Constitutional right, comparisons to other tyrants is not unreasonable. We've already had a taste of Obama's real political philosophy and how badly he wants to change American society. With Obama not having to concern himself about being re-elected, no idea can be considered "too extreme" or "out of the question" for him to try to accomplish, Constitution be damned.
Yes, "He"--one man--crammed socialized medicine down your throat--if you take out the House, Senate, and United States Supreme Court which is majority Republicans.I wish we didn't have socialized roads, bridges, military, schools, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, etc.
Romney passed a permanent "assault weapons" ban and dramatically increased fees for CHL holders as governor. I can't quite remember all those anti-Obama folks like WordKyle comparing Romney to Hitler on this blog.
How can that comparison not be made?Instead of following the will of the people, he is wanting to do Gun Control by Executive Order. He knows that it would not pass if he sent it through the House and Senate.Look at all of the other items and appointments that he has done by Executive Order. He has always had some excuse for needing to use it.
Good grief!! It was just a couple of kids....we can make more. What's up with all the banning of my assault rifles?
3:07, You're one of those low information voters I keep hearing about aren't you?
The liberal weenies murder babies at the rate of one every 90 seconds. Abort 21 outside the womb and we have to ban guns? Shouldn't we be banning coat hangers?
The storm just seems to be cummin in waves..you know,kinda like wave on wave.
If you do not believe an assualt weapons ban/high capacity magazine ban is not the first step to disarm the public you are cawazeeee. Do it by executive order and the world will cheer Obama like never before. He knows this and also knows is sets in motion a campaign against the 2nd amendment that he will leave future admins to hash out. He will be viewed as the one who turned the tide by future generations and he knows the demographics win out. No, Obama won't ban all guns, nor will he send police out to collect them from "our cold dead hands". Makes no sense for him to do it, but he will ban assault rifles by exectutive order. In the years to come the legislation will face less and less opposition until one day, probably 25-30 years in the future, guns will be banned, collected and destroyed, and our children and grandchildren will think nothing of it.
When the President is considering bypassing Congress to unilaterally restrict a fundamental Constitutional right,You don't even know what he proposes to do yet, so it's a bit early to get your panties in a wad. Maybe he increases background checks at gun shows. Or requires private citizens to check with some sort of data base to see if the buyer has a history of mental illness or is a criminal. You have no idea.
Tell the head nigger to come get mine if he thinks he can! most are loaded
No, 3:59PM, 3:07PM's much more intelligent, observant, enlightened and caring. Unlike you, the mouth-breathing worthless, ignorant and racist typical Wise Guy that you are. You just can't get it, nor if you got it, you couldn't comprehend it, nor accept it. Dolt!
You idiot!The reference is relevant since the first operation Hitler passed was to disarm civilians.We all know what happened after that.Sheesh.
313 - Are you referring to the legislation that the Massachusetts legislature passed? Not quite the same thing as a presidential Executive Order. 307 - Obama did command his Democrat flunkies to make Obamacare happen, which they rammed through without a single Republican vote, so yeah, you could say one man crammed it down America's throat.
Hey, I have the right to a weapon as a civilian. But the Constitution doesn't say what kind of hogleg. What if the President said you all can keep/carry/make love to a firearm, but it has to be a Remington 870 pump action shotgun with the 3 shell plug welded in place. Everybody could have a gun, just not the gun they wanted.DF Drunk Bird Hunter going quail hunting with Dick Cheney
Eleven people die every day from texting. Should we not ban cell phones? What about 10,000 DWI deaths per year. Alcohol kills more people every year than guns. Maybe ban booze. Then Barry would be unemployed.
To think it's that unlikely that Obama would try something as far fetched only proves your ignorance in trusting your government too much. Keep on trusting in them dumbass...I mean what could go wrong?
This is about as funny as cancer to me. When you have a far left radical pied piper president hell bent on transforming American. He has all you left wing drones on his side, Lawyers, media, Hollywood and all the talk show host, he can pass just about anything he desires.Yep not funny at all to me Green. The only reason a lot of us come on this blog is to, as they always say "keep our friends close and our enemy's closer"
307, your observations are very fact based but unfortunately Barry has a bunch of trolls on his site that can't wait to jump on anything they can try to pin on Obama.
The protective hedge around America is gone, folks.
like clinton on lewinsky if'n you axe me..
If someone has to play the Hitler OR the Stalin card, they've already lost.Drudge did both in one swoop. Pitiful.
I still do not understand the need for so many executive orders if you believe in a democratic society. This should bother even you BG. I believe you questioned Bush's use of them and President Obama has pretty much extended them plus many more.
I think we should ban coat hangers?333,000+ abortions in 2011.
Owners of assault weapons are desparately wanting to find someone to assault with the weapon. That is why it is called an assault gun. They live and dream and hope to find someone to assault. Maybe someday there could be assault parks like paint ball shooting parks, where they could assault each other in peace.
“If it comes to the actual implementation of an actual confiscatory directive from our president, then I do believe that the heroes of the law enforcement will defy this order. I do believe that there are enough soulless sheep within our government who would act on such an illegal order but I believe the powers that be at the local, state, and regional law enforcement would halt such an illegal, anti-American order,” said Nugent.Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/ted-nugent-gun-owners-the-next-rosa-parks/#7l7BQLUc69zEPpfY.99
Every one of the amendments which make up the bill of rights is designed to protect us from our own government. If they succeed in disarming us it will be much simpler to abuse us in every other way. No, I am not required to limit my gun ownership to hunting weapons only. Hunting is never mentioned in the 2nd amendment.
No, WK, Romney signed the permanent assault weapons ban. One stroke of HIS pen and it became law. You are obviously not stupid, just intellectually dishonest.Romney could've vetoed it, but chose to use his executive power to disarm Americans.Also, as much as you may hate democracy, "Obamacare" was passed by our constitutional form of government and ruled constitutional by our Supreme Court. To suggest Obama did that alone is another example of your failure to be honest with yourself.It's as if you are Sean Hannity based out of W Texas.
No! more! wire! hangers!Mommy Dearest
Be afraid, be very afraid you idiots.
THEY CAN TAKE THEM AWAY. ASK ANY OF US FROM NEW ORLEANS DURING KATRINA.
The ban will only hurt USA business. LaRue Tactical from Texas, Smith and wesson, and even local machine shops. So much for American jobs. There are about 3 shops in the county that produce parts.
Youre an idiot
My goodness, Hitler, Stalin, and Ted Nugent!
834 - Wow, you've managed to twist reality into all kinds of knots to fit your scheme of things. Are you actually equating legislative action with an Executive Order? No differences suggest themselves to you? My opposition to Obama's possible use of EO to curtail Second Amendment rights is quite the opposite of "hating democracy." And the Democrats' abuse of the hegemony they briefly enjoyed is hardly the shining beacon of the best of democracy in action.
"Double fake not 3:07". I'm not sure if your post was meant to be sarcastic or not. If it was not then you are one sad, ignorant, tiny shell of a rational person.
Obama is also coming after your children through your schools. In less than 15 years, Texas will be a blue state.
If we don't start standing up for our rights, we will certainly lose all. The 4th and 2nd Amendment are on the weay out the door. It all starts on the local gov, then snowballs. Tell local gov't NO. Refuse to convict if laws have been bent or broken. Question authority, IT IS YOUR RIGHT!
I am afraid - of too many gun nuts with far too many guns.
I am still looking for a good used howitzer for my front yard.
Hey Wordy:Take a note. Obama got more votes than Romney. This happened after Obamacare was passed. I am going to use this as evidence that a MAJORITY of the poplulation wants Obamacare. The fact that a minority does not like the policies of the Government does make them wrong, immoral, illegal or anything else.And would you "Executive Order" nutcases actually do a little research before you open your mouths? The evidence makes you look both stupid and silly.
I do not believe in the assault weapons ban. I have long been willing to register my weapons, have an extensive background check, give the feds spent casings and bullets for there data base. What I want in return is the 2nd amendment changed to guarantee the right is an individual right for the purpose of protecting myself from the government. That means I should be able to own, or its equivalent, the standard issue weapon given to military. I should be able to own a fully automatic rifle. My idea, have governor good hair, who I believe would love to poke Obama in the eye, create a well regulated Texas militia. Do the checks and whatever else good hair believes is necessary to create a well regulated militia. Then allow the militia the right to keep their weapons in their home, vehicle whatever ala Switzerland. I would enjoy seeing the Feds argue to the Supreme Court that the State of Texas does not have this right. The fight, I believe, would come down to who has the right to determine the militia is well regulated, the Feds or the State.
One thing I forgot to mention in a previous post that pisses me off about the former assault weapons ban. The ban was about emotion and not functionality of the weapon. I couldn't go and buy a new manufactured assault rifle yet I could go buy all of the Remington model 4 rifles I wanted. The Remington model 4 was, and I assume still is, a semi-automatic detachable box magazine weapon. My came with a four round magazine. I could buy ten round magazines for certain and maybe higher capacity. The point is the weapons were capable of doing the exact same thing. One was outlawed because of emotion and looks. If you are going to pass a law to stop a certain outcome (mass shooting from high capacity semi-automatic rifle) from happening at least outlaw all of the weapons/tools capable to causing the outcome. My Model 4 was a 30.06 caliber. I will take a .223 round to my body any day over a 30.06. Prefer to take neither.
846 - Oh, my. Very rarely is it this satisfying to point out someone else's degree of wrongness. I try not to indulge in schadenfreude, but your ignorance/arrogance cocktail makes it difficult.Ahem. According to a CNN poll conducted in November 2012, 51% of Americans oppose Obamacare. And now that increased taxes for everyone to pay for Obamacare have begun to kick in, you can expect to see that opposition grow.
Wow!!! Wordkyle, you are right. 51% is a stunning majority! Obama should go out right now and resign due to the high level of disfavor.Oh, wait. He actually read the results, which shows a 3% margin for error. Guess it is not quite so conclusive after all.Oh, wait. If the disfavor was so great, more people wouldn't have voted for him. I guess they disliked Romney's platform even more.The Ice you are standing on just keeps getting thinner and thinner.Nobody likes change. Nobody likes paying a little more. In 10 years when everybody's rates are down, and everybody has health care, the approval of Obamacare will be around 70%.Quit playing politics and use your math skills.
"In 10 years when everybody's rates are down"The stupidity of that statement alone is beyond belief.
The constitution doesn't say what kind of gun you can have, but the Militia Acts of 1792, which was wrote by our founding fathers does say what kind of gun you can have.
When is the next gun show? My liberal friend said I can get a fully automatic AR 47 with a 124 round clip without an I.D. Using that gun show loop hole thing.
846: "I am going to use this as evidence that a MAJORITY of the poplulation wants Obamacare." When the truth turns out to be the exact opposite of that claim, 1104 simply pretends the statement was never made.Shivers of schadenfreude simply get stronger with each one of those posts.
1131 - I'd never read those acts, so your post was enlightening. However, contrary to your statement that the legislation says what kind of gun militia members could have, it actually informs them of what they must have. In other words, at least "a good musket or flintlock, a sufficient bayonet and belt," etc. Rather than a restriction on possessing weapons, the Acts promoted their possession.
Are they sending the House Nigger with the three dimples in the back of his head to take them
1:33 Which is a clarification of what the constitution says, which is reaffirmed in the second amendment, to be able to bare arms. "To execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions." Or.. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I read nothing in any of the three documents of the constitution that says independent idiots, loaded for bear, fighting imaginary tyranny.
626 - It wasn't a clarification, it was a standardization. When the government officials called up the militia, they wanted it to be sufficiently armed. If you furthered your reading, you'd find that the principles behind the Second Amendment were based solidly on English law, back to Blackstone (1765) and the English Bill of Rights (1689). Blackstone referred to the right of individuals to keep and bear arms as a "natural right of resistance and self preservation."
Twist twist twist. citing foreign law. who are you, Anthony Kennedy. it has nothing to do with taking on the government. The constitution, 2nd amendment and all that followed was set up to protect the state. which by the way the militias were done away with and replaced by the national guard thanks in part to the Militia Act of 1903. taking on the government and changing it to your view is and was always interned to be done by voting. not with guns. Majority rule, but its just so happens the majority voted against your view. be a patriot and deal with it and maybe in the next election, things may be different. they won't, its always going to be BS no matter who wins, but maybe.
1024 - Ah, I see. I'd forgotten what and who I might be dealing with. My mistake. My comments stand for anyone who cares to read them.
read it and your still wrong.
Post a Comment