The Star Telegram has an editorial today on how ambiguous a recent Attorney General's opinion was on the issue of the authority of the State Board of Education.
It was too boring to finish.
But I do know this: Your typical AG's opinion is so full of wiggle room and exceptions that it is normally meaningless.
.jpg)
9.25.2006
No News To Me
The Star Telegram has an editorial today on how ambiguous a recent Attorney General's opinion was on the issue of the authority of the State Board of Education.
It was too boring to finish.
But I do know this: Your typical AG's opinion is so full of wiggle room and exceptions that it is normally meaningless.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I am truly not lawyer bashing but isn't it, at least to some extent, the job of an attorney to wax philosophical based on a higher level of intelligence when, in reality, they are all the while intending to never say anything conclusive?? btw see also: politicians
The only persons I have ever heard speak pointedly and specifically in court are the expert witnesses who are being paid by the one for which they speak.
I apologize for the cynicism but at a point we have to stop kidding ourselves.
Sums it up.
Post a Comment