The Campaign For DA

6.04.2015

It's Like Looking At The Odds For A Horse Race




And probably as unpredictable.

20 comments:

wordkyle said...

Wow. Hispanics, an Asian, an African-American, a woman...That's pretty diverse. Um, what's the ethnic makeup of the Democrat candidates again?

Anonymous said...

Jindal.... India

Anonymous said...

And Gawd told most of them to run! Piss off, Turdkyle. The Republicans have a bunch of socio- and/or psychopathic liars, (as are most politicians) plus they're all egomaniacs. What a world, what a world.

Anonymous said...

Other= Gay
None of the above=Morphodite
Don't know=Transexual

Anonymous said...

Speaking of large crowds of straight-laced folks, lots of thrashing about, and baser instincts, did you see the news blurb from Weatherford regarding the swingers club in a gated community near Cresson?

Wise County, you need to pick up your game.

DF Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice

wordkyle said...

440 - I agree that anyone who runs for president likely has egomaniacal tendencies. Other than that, you haven't shown anything to prove why you should even be allowed an opinion, much less get to express it in a public place. Want to try again?

420 - India is in Asia.

Anonymous said...

But where does The Donald land? Trump 2016, ha ha

Anonymous said...

4:40 -- your less than even-handed comment makes me want to label you as a Democrat. Am I right? I'll bet I am.

Anonymous said...

In the democratic horse race, I'll bet 2 dollars on the nag.

Anonymous said...

5:09 -

Pretty sure everyone is entitled to HAVE an opinion, and even express it in a public place. But the rest of us aren't obligated to care about it, or even listen.

Since you seem to think people need a license to speak, are you the arbiter of who can talk and what they can say? If not you, then who?

wordkyle said...

848 - Unwad your panties. When people get ugly in their comments toward me, I occasionally respond in kind. My comment was more about the quality of 440 #1's comment rather than his (in)ability to express it. He was the equivalent of a child misbehaving to get the attention of adults who are trying to have a conversation. I just gave him a verbal swat.

Anonymous said...

9:11 -

You spend an inordinate amount of time here calling people out when they say things that you think are stupid. You don't get a pass when you do the same.

wordkyle said...

939 - It wasn't stupid, it was mean, oppressive, and arrogant. It was also done ironically, in that Liberals respond that way for real all the time. Are your panties that tight?

Anonymous said...

10:47 -

What's your motivation for behaving the way that you do? The condescension, arrogance, name calling, etc.

wordkyle said...

1201 - Rephrase your question properly and I'll give you a proper answer.

Anonymous said...

No answer, but a snide remark instead. I guess I shouldn't expect more. I'm not attacking; I'm not being an ass. I'm just curious - why treat people this way?

If it's just a shtick, that's fine - we all have one on the Internet. I guess I'm just wondering if this is your preferred method of interacting with people IRL, or if you chose to act this way online for a specific reason.

Anonymous said...

1:26

Time for you to start your own blog.

Oh.....wait.

Anonymous said...

12:01

You left out "pompous".

Anonymous said...

Wordkyle doesn't know his motivation. You have to give him an answer so he can spin it.

wordkyle said...

See how you are, kids? Y'all talk like that, then expect an adult to pay you serious attention. I'm very happy to have a real discussion, but not with adolescents.