blank'/> Liberally Lean From The Land Of Dairy Queen: Girl Didn't Wear Underwear -- World Now Knows

5.15.2009

Girl Didn't Wear Underwear -- World Now Knows

Link. (The news story's embeddable video didn't embed at all.) Note to high schoolers: When you are going to get a group yearbook picture taken, remember it is a yearbook - not Maxim. Edit: CNN video here. Home girl still ain't sittin' properly.

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am still waiting for picture

Anonymous said...

where oh where do we see it at

Anonymous said...

Remind me to tell you something really mportant later. Cant talk about it now.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Where"s the pic??? You can't just say that and not have a pic!!!!

Anonymous said...

no pix on line, as the girl is a minor

Anonymous said...

"I'll sue ya, I'll take ALL your money, I'll sue ya, even if you look at me funny."

Fake Weird Al Yankovick

Anonymous said...

Thank you very much! Seriously, not just those pics but have you seen "prom" dresses these days?

Anonymous said...

Video can be seen on CNN. Everything, even her face, has been shadowed.

Anonymous said...

pic please

Anonymous said...

What an idiot. First, wear panties. Second, if you didnt, you perhaps shouldnt be on the front row of any pictures. The mother is an idiot too. All the yearbooks should be reprinted because she didn't teach her child the above? Didn't hear her offer to pay for the reprinting.......

Anonymous said...

The caption with the video on the CNN website is hilarious:

"A Florida student's mom demands the school yearbook be reprinted after her daughter is shown bottomless, with no panties"

As opposed to being bottomless with no legs?

Anonymous said...

the school is reporting that annual sales are thru the roof, they can't keep up with demand.

Anonymous said...

Good grief. She made the choice to go to school with no panties on and then sit in way that exposes it. I'm not sure she didn't do it on purpose; I think the position of her hand is suspicious. And now her mom is blaming the school for exploiting her daughter as she talks about it on CNN????

They're both in it for the money they plan to make when they sue the district for a bajillion dollars.

Anonymous said...

why do y'all want to see a picture of a 15 year old's crotch? she is 15?

Anonymous said...

ain't that britt's little sis..!?

Anonymous said...

Reminds me of my ex-girlfriend-she NEVER wore panties under any circumstances because she hated panty lines.........I never understood why she feared panty lines so much!!!

chupacabra said...

Well, she came by her pure dee, straight up, slap dab, white trashiness honestly- at least.

She was consientious of her appearance enough to not wear panties so panty lines wouldn't be showing but, gave no thought to her poonanee that WOULD be showing?

Hmmm, let me think about that one...

Mr. Mike Honcho said...

Oh my. SO, we can establish the girl is ate up with the dumb a--. Completely ate up.

Mom is "slightly monied" white trash. She is either:

a) also a dumb a--.

b) honestly thinking she can parlay this into some kind of lottery winning lawsuit.

c) mostly some of a) and a touch of b)

Anonymous said...

Isn't there a law about deliberately looking at an underage kid's vagina? Or for that matter deliberately sending the picture to others? Once a person knows what's in the picture, and that person's only intent is prurient...well, there's a lot of folks doing ten right now for no different.

Anonymous said...

I sent in my money. I hope it gets here soon.

Anonymous said...

Maybe it needs to breath for a few weeks, overworked by the Newark step-dad.

Propagandist said...

Sounds like fairly typical nanny state mentality.
1.)Mom failed miserably to teach 16 year old daughter how to behave like a decent person and avoid public humiliation.
2.)Mom probably knew 16 year old daughter wasn't wearing panties the day she left for school photos.
3.)Mom demands school administrators do something to remedy the consequences of 16 year old daughter's actions.
4.)Daughter claims she is being humiliated by the people passing out the yearbooks for which she voluntarily flashed her fuzzy girl parts.

More proof that, more often than not, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Neither one of these two are the victim or as innocent as they'd like you to believe.

If you want to see the rest of the story and see pictures of the mom taking bong hits with her teenage daughter and her daughter's teenage friends click this link.

Anonymous said...

maybe this poor child can't afford no panties or squirrel covers as we like to call the in chico..