liberals r so blinded by theyre hatred for Bush that you cant even understand english. all hes saying is someday history will be glad that someone had the ball to get in the fight, and not quit when the libs start whining.
9:30 - Bad grammar just like your idiot Republican leader. I know 5th graders who can speak and write better than the both of you.Also, does Bush only have one ball?
The Middle East is more of problem today than it was before Bush 43 sent in the troops. How many MORE of our troops are going to die in the never-ending war?
If the safety and well-being of our country were left to the libs like Barry, we would have had bombings here and war over there. Shut up about Bush. His vocabulary might not go as deep as yours, but his will to protect this country is deep and wide. Leave him alone.
Conservatives should be educated enough to spell too.
9:30 Before you start commenting on others understanding of English,you might want to take a look at your's first.Let's recap shall we?Your entry:liberals r so blinded by theyre hatred for Bush that you cant even understand english. all hes saying is someday history will be glad that someone had the ball to get in the fight, and not quit when the libs start whining.Now the corrected version:Liberals are soo blinded by they're hatered for Bush,they can't even understand English. All he's saying is someday people will be glad that someone had the balls to get in the fight and not quit when the liberals started whinning.The word "History" was dropped for the more appropriate word "People" as History is an inanimate object incapable of feeling.
If everyone was judged solely on vocabulary and spelling then most of the posters on this blog would be in the "retarded" category. People with no leg to stand on in an argument typically resort to 1) name calling, 2) grammar correction or 3) spellchecking as a way out of the fight.Oh, and don’t even try it. You can be damn sure I proofread this post for errors.
Just appreciate the fact that his college scores were higher than Gores or Kerrys.
George W. Bush---The Greatest President in the History of the United States!!!
I thought we had a truce about cheap shots on spelling and grammar on the blog since these are quickly typed comments and not college term papers.
10:17 AM- That's right, and Kenneth Copland is the greatest preacher in the history of the U.S.LOL!
Yeah, what he said might become true, if he and his minions are allowed to continue to be the World Police. After they start WWIII, there won't be any of us left alive to document, much less read those history books.Now, to all you BushCo supporting sheeple, go ahead and rapture yourselves RIGHT FREAKING NOW, and get yourselves the hell off my precious Earth.
bg - you can't understand it? Figures
their...not They're. Sorry..had to.
Don't make me come out of retirement!! I have nothing better to do... hence my name.I agree w/ Crud. The spelling and grammar arguments are weak and a cheap way to debate. If you don't have a valid position and must resort to pointing out typos, then STFU!!
Pity the poor parents who will one day look back and know that Bush and Co sacraficed their sons for political gain..........not fighting terror......or they would have gone after the terrorist in a totally different country.I am not a religious nut, but my Bible says there won't be peace between the sons of Ismael and the sons of Isaac until the second coming........and Bush and Co are supposed to have read that book.
I did not have sexual relations with that woman!
By correcting the spelling and Grammer of The Bushy/Cheney Sheep it makes a valid point of the original post. Barry made an observation about the logic of the thought (or lack thereof)of the worst President in US History. By pointing out the spelling and grammer errors of the sheep following him, it lends credibility to Barry's original post.BTW, thanks vmwcpa, you beat me to the punch.
I did have sexual relations with her because she said you wouldn't.
Had C-SPAN on in the office this morning - pretty typical boring stuff. But a number caught my attention. 755,000 PEOPLE ON A TERRORIST WATCH LIST!! 755,000???How many people took how long to just to enter that many names in a database?? Maybe if he would actually spend time catching a couple of well known leaders that number would dwindle significantly?
To the Bush lover: Please, in your awesome way, explain why we are fighting this war over there and yet he won't secure our borders and ports here? This is not logical nor does it make sense.
[sigh] If you'd slow down and try to understand it, you would. It does make sense. The structural syntax is a bit wonked, but whatever... "I had a dog. I had a pony." --Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truthlol
First the word "suiciders" - the meaning is clear, and the word has been used previously. It takes active not-wanting-to-understand to misconstrue Bush's statement.1. Some day people are going to look back on this time and day.2. [They] will say "Thank God there was a generation that did not lose faith.3. "[Because] The Middle East is free of suiciders."The "anointed" who constantly belittle the President's grammar show a dearth of logic: "I hate Bush, therefore he's wrong, therefore he's stupid." Give it up. Such thinking is so 2000.
Damn, WK. I often agree with you, but seldom so much as today. No, GWB is not the second coming, but those who wish he would act more like Neville Chamberlain continuue to amaze ne with their death wish for freedom and the American ideal.
M&M and whoever else is listening:I see this war being fought by a President who perceived this under the circumstances and prevailing societal weakness of liberals and ACLU, LULAC, and La Raza bleeding hearts, as being the best way to protect us from further attacks on our home soil. After all, as long as their running around in the desert to get away from our guys they can't be flying planes into buildings or strapping dynamite to themselves and walking into a full football stadium. Do you all not see and hear the resistance to efforts to close the borders to illegal infiltration by aliens? I hear stories and reports of the border patrol being spread out too thin and under funded. Then when citizens join in (specifically the Minutemen group) they are attacked and profoundly criticized as vigilantes for doing a job that the government will not do. However, the criticism contains no actual allegations of criminal conduct. Then I see stories of our government prosecuting border patrol agents who shoot and kill infiltrating aliens in the course of their duty in protecting our borders. I hear story after story on liberal stations like Belo Broadcasting, NBC, and MSNBC giving air time and credence to the Hispanic organizations who complain about how keeping illegal infiltrators out is a racist policy. And those are such a few as to not even dent the resistance the President has to face when taking measure to close up the borders. Therefore, going out and hunting them down in their home turf seems to be the most logical approach.For my choice, I will gladly trade you liberal thinkers straight up: we will end the war if you will let us use the military and any other means to close up the borders to catch and use whatever means necessary to stop and/or repel illegal infiltrators. That includes stopping this nonsense of continually trying to give them the rights of Americans under the Constitution. They are not Americans, and the Constitution does not apply to them. That also includes ceasing the flow of federal, state, or local government money to give the illegals aid and comfort. If I'm the President, I make that trade with the Nancy Pelosi lead liberal lunatic fringe. I will bring all of our guys and equipment home if you let me do whatever it takes to lock up our borders.
Dear brave anon 12:06 PMI appreciate your opinion, now let me share mine.Also pity the poor grandchildren of the poor parents who will one day look back and know that if the US would have continued the war on terror in the Middle East instead of pulling out to negotiate peacefully, there would be less death and terror that's will come on our nation.Clinton and Co sacrificed every life at the World Trade Center due to their unconcerned inaction of the situation, even after acknowledging Bin Laden and WMD's in Iraq. Bush and Co have their problems too, but bitching about it doesn't do any good.If you read your Bible, it also says, "Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye."Casting blame is futile idiocy. You're just part of the problem if you're not part of the solution.
ah..um..Denny?"Clinton and Co sacrificed every life at the World Trade Center due to their unconcerned inaction of the situation, even after acknowledging Bin Laden and WMD's in Iraq."..."Casting blame is futile idiocy. You're just part of the problem if you're not part of the solution."
Denny Crane!(sorry, got caught up with my Boston Legal episodes last night; you're lucky Denny didn't call you "fat." lol)
Actually, 9:30 is the reason that Bush is president. Anybody with grammer and spelling such as that wouldn't bother to learn anything about a candidate before voting for them.
You make me proud 10:54. I was going to say something similar but I read your comment first and decided that I couldn't have said it any better.
to 11:04 am:Your response is typical of the liberally lead contingent who want to disavow the past. Remember, those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. The terrotists seem to live for the times of a democratic party president. The Iranians get really brave during Jimmy Carter's administration, but when President Reagan lets them know who's boss, they settle down and back off. President Bush I chased their butts enough to give them a little kicking, but apparently not enough to let them take it seriously. Then the curtain rises on Billy Clinton and company. The intelligence network is ignored and unraveled. Consistent terrortistic threats are ignored in favor of getting ourselves involved in the Yugoslavian civil war over human rights issues (there was no direct threat to our nation or our way of life). You can't just close your eyes to what Clinton did. He completely mishandles US foreign policy. Don't get me wrong. Like any crime,the person to blame is the criminal himself. 9-11 was on the terrorists. Clinton was the guy that left the keys in the car and door unlocked to make it easier for the criminal to succeed (if you see the analogy). We need to learn from that and understand that these people, like Adolph Hitler, cannot be stopped or appeased by diplomacy. They must be forcibly divested of their ability to commit these atrocities even if it means relieving them of their pathetic lives.
I agree with denney crane and wordkyle, we need to protect our country for ourselves and the future generations. Do you really want your grandkids being forced to learn Arabic? Do you want your granddaughters to be free to chase their own destinies, or would you like to see them repressed and silenced by the threat of death? Remember how Nelville Chamberlain gave Hitler more and more time to gather his forces? He had a huge hand in the fact that it took so long to defeat Germany. The politics of appeasement don't work. We have seen it historically and there is no reason to believe it would work now. The serpent is insatiable, the more it gets, the more it wants. If we try to appease them by getting Israel to give up the land they are fighting over, they will want to occupy Jerusalem after that. There will be no satisfying them. They just have to be stopped.
11:04 AMThank you for your attention to detail, I think that was very well put...although;I don't consider sharing history and information the same as placing blame, especially when it's with a hater that I want to share my view.Although I didn't vote for Clinton, I didn't run him into the ground because I disagreed with him. He was the President and should be held in high esteem until proven unworthy or a traitor to his country...history will decide his affect on our country. Bush has not been proven unworthy or a traitor, no matter what his detractors say...no matter what you think...no matter how you feel! He acted on information that the entire congress agreed with. Now they/we blame him and want to pull out of Iraq and create a greater catastrophe. I disagree with the war! I disagree with pulling out! I believe we must finish what we started or we will have homeland terrorism that will rival our Civil War.We the people...the congress...the President started this war: all of us. Have the balls to let them finish! Go save some animals or something, but don't endanger me and my family's future because you don't have the fortitude to help fix what you helped destroy.Okay, you want to hear real insanity...Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter are nice guys. Lousy Presidents, but really nice guys. Even worse, I trust Hilary more than Bill! She has the balls to stand up and fight for what she wants! I believe she is more apt to action than Bill. Don't get me wrong, I would never vote for her, but watch what happens when someone gets in her way! She will destroy them... I may not agree her views, but I do respect her ability to put together a machine that takes no prisoners.I feel sick, I'm gonna go throw up now...
Hey Denny, all of that fence-sitting is gonna give you a permanent wedgie. I don't trust Hillary. I think she is willing to use bullying and whiny passive-aggressive self-victimization to achieve her domestic goals. I think she will leave us defenseless just like that idiot husband of hers did, and don't forget that she is a socialist of the first degree. This we do not need. I want to believe that my government lead by a gutsy Commander-in-Chief is protecting my family and me and preserving America for the future generations. I also want to know that the fruits of my labors will be mine and not coerced from my hands as a forced charitable contribution for some other person or group. No thank you very much. SCHIP was a grandstand play by the socialist lunatics. It was not for the poor. Under their plan, a family earning as much as $63,000 per year could have qualified for government subsidized (i.e.-paid for by working taxpayers) health insurance. It is morally wrong and reprehensible to take money from one person to give to another. If you want to be charitable, do it from your own pocket, don't reach into mine. No Hillary, no way, no how.
I wonder what this blog will look like a year from now with a president-elect Clinton or Obama awaiting inauguration? You blinded Bush-lovers are in for an eye-opener. Fortunately, the rest of the country is not nearly as intelligence-challenged as many of our Wise Co bloggers.
4:28 pm anonymous:Dream on if you want to, but be careful what you wish for. You will sing a different song when you are paying income taxes at a 50% rate while learning to speak Arabic after Osama bin Laden is the Secretary of State. You are delusional if you think any of those dems will protect us.
4:28 PM - You have added about, oh...NOTHING to the debate. Relying on the technique used exclusively and exhaustively by Liberals, you managed to 1) Insert a non sequitir regarding a possible win by uber-Liberal (check his voting record) Hussein Obama or "does she or doesn't she" Mrs. Bill Clinton (her only resume point.) Check out the wonders of Hillary here.2) You use the term "blinded Bush-lovers," although many of the statements here from those who support Bush show ambivalence, indicating neither love nor blindness. 3) In a textbook example of Freudian projection, you cast aspersions on the intelligence of those with whom you disagree. Based, of course, on the fact that they are not part of the "anointed" who share the socialist vision. Since you seem incapable of expressing a coherent opinion, much less forming an opinion based on facts -- such as reading what posters have actually posted -- it's no surprise that you look forward to Democrat authoritarianism.All of which explain the blanket Liberal fascination with Bush's grammar -- so wrapped up in your serpentine tongue, you can't understand someone who simply says what he means and believes what he says.
Wordpile you just wear me out! You claim 4:28 added nothing to the debate while he/she only speculated on the possible changes impending with the probablility (according to polls) that a Democrat being elected president. Then you start the inane name calling using Obama's middle name (given by his parents without his input) and claiming Hillary's only qualification is being Bill's wife. If you want to investigate resumes, try inspecting Giuliani’s 2) As for the ever dwindling Bush supporters being "blind", if they're not blind at least they vigorously seem to avoid objective analysis of Bush's (really Cheney's) mismanagement of the executive branch. 3) The criminal or at least marginally criminal acts of this administration are only now being uncovered due to the Republicans in congress avoiding their oversight roll for the past 6 years. And why do you simplistically label anyone who disagrees with you a socialist? While you claim someone is looking forward to "Democrat authoritism", you apparently haven't read John Dean's book on the corruption of Goldwater conservativism by the current Cheney/Bush version of Republican authoritarianism and the recent and well documented best seller, "Takeover". I'm just hoping the impending changes in all three branches of government will finally return us to our constitutional balance and begin restoring our government of laws with justice for all.
Thanks for illustrating what passes for thought among Democrats. You want something to be so, therefore it must be so, regardless of the facts. All your arguments are based on that desire, rather than evidence.1) At least you admit that Hussein is, indeed, Obama's given name. I note that you don't dispute his Liberal intentions.Mrs. Clinton's qualifications? Ever run a business? uh, no. Ever responsible for police or military? uh, no. Ever elected in a state where she lived? uh, no. (Dont' bother -- she moved to NY to run for the Senate,only.) Ever responsible for a budget? uh, no.On the other hand, she touts her "accomplishments" in the 90's when her husband was POTUS. However, they have locked up any documents that might indicate what she actually did. And planting questions in what's supposed to be a town hall setting? Uh, absolutely.2) I have yet to see Liberal Democrats give "objective" analysis of anything, especially in this forum. Partisanship is fine, but don't try to describe it as "objective." Now -- how do you support your implication that Cheney is Bush's boss? You must have good evidence to make a claim so publicly. Or is this more of the Liberal affliction I described in my first paragraph?3) With all the accusations the Democrats and Liberal media have thrown at Bush the last several years, EVERYTHING has been revealed, including tactics to defeat terrorists who want to kill Americans. Again, truth doesn't matter to those driven by "the vision." And exactly what is your evidence of Bush admin's "criminal acts?"Lots of people who are not Socialists disagree with me. However, the Liberal dream of centralised control, resulting in the loss of individuality -- commonly known as Socialism -- drives them to attack, rather than refute the arguments of, those with whom they disagree.For what it's worth, I agree that the judiciary has entirely coopted the legislative process by their activism.
Yo Crud...I said I trusted Hilary more than Bill... I didn't say I trusted Hilary! Bill was proven to be an outright liar.It's like saying I would rather be bitten by a copperhead than a rattlesnake...the fangs are smaller on the copperhead...although still poisonous.
how long have the Jews been negotiating with the islamic fascist? since 1948how many dead Jews since then? God only knows.so screw negotiations, and kill em all
Post a Comment