The meltdown continues.
I didn't see or hear him speak, was he referring to progress regarding ethnic discrimination between the generations?
I hope Miss Teen South Carolina is appointed to replace him. Her answers to congress would be much clearer than his.
I think it's clear that G W Bush is a person of very limited intellectual capacity. The real tragedy for his presidency is that he chose so poorly the advisors surrounding him. Gonzales is only one of many inferior players that have doomed this presidency to the lowest rungs in presidential "rankings."
1:17 Agreed. But how can anyone with very limited intellectual capacity be expected to make any good choices about anything?
When you fire 8 liberal judges for not not delivering justice, you get 80 liberal politicians that crawl up your ass and die... Now those same liberal politicians/lawyers have to go find other judges to purchase...What a shame
Bush, the greed, is swimming in Iraq's oil fields.Why do we keep electing liars? The next administration will be no different.
I hate to tell you guys this, but Gonzales can't recall resigning. I read that some where but I can't recall where.
1:37 I don't know. You made the choice to agree with 1:17 so I guess you answered your own question.
1:17 & 1:37 - How is it "clear" that Bush is a "person of very limited intellectual capacity?"Bush received his bachelor's degree in history from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. His GPA in college was higher than those of "intellectuals" John Kerry and Al Gore. Bush is reported to be a voracious reader. (The reading list is not lightweight, either.)If Bush is intellectually inferior, how was he able to win two presidential elections over supposedly more-intelligent Democrats?Bush's verbal gaffes? As has been mentioned before, he may not be the best public speaker, but when he speaks, you know what he's saying. Democrats such as Bill Clinton ("It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is") and John Kerry ("I voted for the war before I voted against it") dissemble so much that they constantly have to go back and clarify their statements. What does that say about their intellect?While you may not agree with all of Bush's policies or decisions, -- I certainly don't -- to believe that he is intellectually limited goes against the evidence.
Well said Wordkyle.
Hey TxSheehan, good job of throwing in some intellect into the conversation. Did you read that on DailyKos or Huffington post? That pinging sound you hear is that BB rolling around in your brain pan.
If all the Messcans are gone,where are we gonna go for lunch?
Oh no! Not WordKyle's link to Bush's reading list again. You must have that saved on your computer and just recycle it when needed.
Prove to us that he really reads those books, Pyle. "Reported to be a voracious reader" proves nothing. His handlers are just spinning us, and you present yourself as ignorant enough to believe them. Now, I might agree if you said Laura reads them to him each night.
TxSheehan, Kind of like when you link to DailyKos.
Sheehan , you need a good Shocker ! Is there anybody out there that can help this women ?
TXS and 6:09 - Bush's reading habits have been reported several times, all with the same information - he reads a lot, and understands what he reads. Not an indication of "limited intellectual capacity."If you two are disputing this evidence in order to prop up your hatred-based, mistaken notions, then please feel free to provide evidence to support your contention. (Sharon, if you guys will quit trotting out the same lies over and over, I'l quit producing the same truth over and over.)
Wordpyle, Kinda weird seeing you chastise anyone for being hateful. You're one of the most hate filled belligerent ass nuggets I've ever seen.
Oh no! The haters are back. How will I live with the pain?Here's how! Another Republican pervert. Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) was arrested in June at a Minnesota airport by a plainclothes police officer investigating lewd conduct complaints in a men’s public restroom, according to an arrest report obtained by Roll Call Monday afternoon.And we're supposed to listen to anything you Republicans say? LOL @ U
Wordkyle AKA The Bushlover --Bush may be "Book Smart", but he doesn't have a measureable amount of COMMON SENSE and you are SO gullible to all his propeganda.
Hey Sheehan, We never left.
823 - What makes you think I'm full of hate? Because I refuse to be bullied by Liberals? Any belligerence I have displayed is always tit for tat -- I always try to be polite until I'm attacked. Then...well, you call down the thunder....As for TXS, again we see what happens -- Liberals can't back up their accusations with facts, so they change the subject.
Bush #43 is an idiot.
Guys, Bush was never anything but the ventriquilist dummy. Reprising his role from the Texas Rangers.The chickens have come home to roost.............almost 4000 of America's finest dead so we can have an Iranian backed Shite government in Iraq........but long enough for for Bushie's friends to make billions off the war.
To the Republican apologists: Sorry to bust your spin but the calls for Gonzo to resign were made by members of both political parties.
Wordkyle 6:45 We've had this discussion before and your claim that Bush is an avid reader was busted by several LL readers. I don't feel the need to recycle all those old arguments in order to prove that you are irrelevant.
4000 of America's finest are dead. I consider this a very serious tragedy.When Hilary's term is up, we will read about how many Americans have been killed by terrorist attacks on our own soil. Hide and watch!
TS: no, you are quite wrong. There has never been a shred of evidence presented to dispute the fact that Bush is an avid reader. That he IS a reader has been reported in the NY Times, US News, and on NPR (hardly Republican bastions.) Your referring to non-existent previous "busts" won't work. In previous posts it's been just like this one -- I provide evidence, and you Bush-haters dispute it because you don't want it to be true. Your pre-conceived notion of Bush, based on nothing but your hatred, brushes aside anything as bothersome as the truth.It's amusing to me that you will hold so tightly onto an opinion that has been thoroughly proven wrong; especially one as insignificant as this.
Back at you WK. Refer to your own blog and the crazy distorted "facts" you share with the world there. I'm not going to waste my time looking back through the posts when you are in the 25% who still believes the BS.
Couldn't find anything, huh, Sharon?
To TxSharon...Pssssstttt.....You are arguing with an idiot and starting to look foolish. Let Wordpuke have the last word so he will fade away into the nothingness where people are best served for him to remain.
I know but his responses make me laugh and sometimes I need a good laugh. =)
To MC and TS -- Both of you together and that's the best you can do??
Post a Comment