Thank you Barry, for pointing out something I've been saying for a long time now. I call them Faux News, all spin, all the time.
WHAT A WAY TO COOL DOWN
All the TV stations back then were like this. All spin, all the time.
Easy to poke fun at the media -- how about that CBS and its falsified memos six weeks before a presidential election? The NBC Dateline scandal where they faked an explosion to demonstrate "unsafe" trucks? Those jokers! They're a laff-riot! No wonder you swallow everything they say, hook, line & sinker! How could you resist?FOX is more "fair and balanced" than the other leading media.Given the Liberal fascination with Fox's supposed "bias," why are you so blind to the biases of the other mainstream media?
I'm completely shocked by the bias expressed on the "TEN" channel... Totally biased.
wordkyle, the liberals on this blog are blind to ANYTHING that goes against the grain of their hate-filled blathering about anything conservative-- or, for that matter, logical...
hey wordkyle, how about EVERYTHING the new York times has done to undermine American security by the stories they write on an almost daily basis, such as the US government's plan to track terrorists through their banking activity, a SECRET plan.Gee, THAT"S not hurting our country at all, huh? They ought to be tried for treason...
HOSE BACKIE DOWN !
you forget one thing that was to put geraldo covering the story
CNN's headline would have been, Negros take a bath at tax payers expense.
Poor pathetic Wordkyle, he still buys into the "liberal media" myth and actually accepts FAUX news as even resembling reality. I'll bet he even still thinks there are WMD in Iraq and there are nothing but "dead enders" there opposing us.
Barry- you're so totally FOS.
It is time for the government to take over all media news outlets. We will all then know what the truth really is without the liberal bias. Or maybe just outlaw and shutdown all news outlets, except FOX, which seems like it is already pretty much run, or at least influenced, by the "shadow government." This is news we can trust. Who needs the First Amendment anyway. Well, maybe keep it and just white out the freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Keep the religion part, just specify religion is no longer a choice and has to be Christian based, and Falwell specifications met. Controlling the news has really worked well for government in other countries. You Connynist, start contacting your congressmen now to do away theses freedoms. Who needs real freedom anyway. Just let the government take charge, and let us know only what they want us to know.
Any news media that really is "fair and balanced" is liberal slanted to a conservative. Hard core conservative slanted is "fair and balanced" to a conservative. How about all liberal and conservative news media reporting the trashing of the Whitehouse and Air Force One by the Clinton Administration during the Bush regime change when it did not even happen? If you are one of the ones that claim "yea it did!" Where are the pictures? There was no proof to this, the liberal press reported this, as did Foxy news. Limbaugh had the damage cost up to $250,000 bucks. I figured we were screwed with Doobieya at this early point in time when he could have stopped this charade by telling his fans that this never happened. Instead, Doobieya let his Followers wallow in misconception by just saying something like: "It is time to just move on." Speaking of "liberal media" do radio stations like KLIF, WBAP, and even KRLD (news all the time) that have 24/7 conservative shows going from radicals like Mike Savage, Mark Lavin, Mark Davis, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc., to somewhat more milder but still hardcore conservative shows count as "news media" or they only called "entertainment" when they rant and rave their conservative views? It seems that when their conservative mouth overloads their conservative butts, all they have to do is say "Hey! We are Entertainment! Not real News!" But conservatives that listen to those that rant and rave, regard it as "only the truth," and as "real news" (they believe Pro Wrestling is real also) and "Rush, how should I vote?" There may have been a more "liberal bias" in the "news media" in the long ago past when the country was a lot more progressive and freedom loving, but does not mean it is so now. Some media outlets may be more liberal than others, some less liberal than others, but FOX News for sure is not fair, or balanced in their reporting.
10:21, Check out the youtube of Al Gore in 92 giving all the same reasons to take out Iraq because of the same reasons given by Bush to go to war on Limbaugh's web site. Then you can shut up about the Bush lied liberal mantra. Keep in mind that even then in 92 the ties to Iraq amd Al Quaida were obvious and 8 years of nothing being done about it by your hero Slick Willie.
THAT IS HOLD THE BLACK MAN DOWN NOT HOSE THE BLACK MAN DOWN. DUU
Anon 12:48 -- Interesting you should bring up the White House vandalism that "didn't happen" -- A GAO report disagrees with your conclusion.Some highlights:"Damage, theft, vandalism, and pranks did occur in the White House complex during the 2001 presidential transition. "The director of the Office of Administration(OA), who had been present during five previous transitions, said that he was "stunned" by what he saw during the 2001 transition and had not seen anything similar during previous ones, particularly in terms of the amount of trash."So Bush's response, which you criticize, was actually an example of courtesy and grace.Liberals ignore every piece of evidence, no matter how convincing, that contradicts their preconceived notions. Remember when Liberals were considered "open-minded?"Not any more.
Anon 10:21 -- A lot of personal attacking in your post, but not much in the way of facts to dispute what I say. Here's more for you from the Liberal media:Where's the mainstream media coverage of Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein's scandal? As chairperson and ranking member of the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee, Sen. Feinstein voted for appropriations worth billions to her husband's firms. She abruptly resigned her position when a local publication exposed the conflict of interest.Have you seen anything in the mainstream media about this at all? The stories that the media choose to cover (or not cover) indicate bias as much as their treatment of those stories. They soft-pedal Democrat scandals and hammer Republicans.
For those of you who refuse to think anything bad about liberals or their ilk, here is what the report wordkyle referenced said under "results":"Damage, theft, vandalism, and pranks did occur in the White Housecomplex during the 2001 presidential transition. Multiple people said that,at the beginning of the Bush administration, they observed (1) many officesthat were messy, disheveled, or contained excessive trash or personalitems; (2) numerous prank signs, printed materials, stickers, and writtenmessages that were left behind, some of which contained derogatory andoffensive statements about the president; (3) government property thatwas damaged, including computer keyboards with missing or damaged “W”keys and broken furniture; and (4) items that were missing, such as officesigns, a presidential seal, cellular telephones, doorknobs, and telephonenumber labels. In addition, documentation provided indicated that somebroken, missing, or possibly stolen items were repaired or replaced at thebeginning of the Bush administration. Several EOP staff said they believedthat what they observed during the transition, such as broken furniture andexcessive trash left behind, was done intentionally."Of course the Clinton administration officials denied they did anything wrong, but the proof is clear that they did. You'll either deny it or say it was just a harmless prank, but you can't deny that it was classless and simply hateful towards the Bush administration. Heck, you'll probably even applaud them for taking one last stab at the "horrible Bush administration."Or perhaps all you liberals will just either ignore it or claim it didn't happen, then yell "but what about those WMD's?" But here's undeniable proof from an official document that, by the way, was 220 pages long. It would be pretty hard to make up something that lengthy, I think.Take that and chew on it, liberals...and face the fact you have a blind hatred for anything Bush, conservative, etc. That fact alone makes all your rhetoric worth about two cents.
Why do negros always cause so much trouble for everyone?
Where are pictures of all this damage? So and so said this blah, blah, damage blah, prank blah, etc.Would the Bush bunch really pass up PICTURES of all this terrible, horrible, carnage and damage to the Whitehouse and AirForce1 in order to show what destructive heatherns the Clinton Administration was? Llinks to the pictures, please.
It was probably the Republicans themselves that "Trashed the Whitehouse" and "Airforce 1." I looked at the GAO pdf and searched for Airforce1, Air force 1 and Air Force, and found no references to "Picked to the ribs and sars" mention, and looking through the detailed document, some of the stuff damaged could have been already damaged, or could have been done by somebody else. Such as Republicans taking over so they could say "Clinton Whitehouse Trashing" or something like that. In fact, being's Republikan Komrade Karl Rove bugged his own office and blamed it on the Democrats, it makes perfect sense that incoming Republicans would trash the Whitehouse so they could cry "Oh Looky, Looky what those bad Democrats done" type thing. The whitehouse trash thing was just that. Right Wing White Trash.Go Rush and His Zombie Army! Rush Army Private TordPyle, Here is your orders to post today:......
Post a Comment