Oh, so now Drudge is a reliable news source, but when he exposed Bill Clinton as an adulterer he is a kook. Which one is it? I love the liberal mindset.
To anonyNOTHING 10:48... Least we NOT forget adding to the list of Clinton failures the events leading up to the attack and murder on the 11th of September 2001 of nearly 3,000 United States CIVILIANS working WITHIN the United States.
************************************
Of course there will ALWAYS be those people who think it is FAR worse for 3,000 soldiers, marines, airmen and sailors to be killed during the course of nearly 4 years performing the job for which they VOLUNTEERED and were TRAINED than it is for CIVILIANS to be MURDERED going about their lives WITHIN the United States. In the MINDS of people who think this is CORRECT they feel JUSTIFIED in being pissed at President Bush.
In the words of MY brother a US Army, Lt. Col. serving his THIRD tour in Afghanistan, "What the hell is wrong with civilians? Do they think troops are issued automatic weapons the second week of training and shoot at targets shaped like humans because it is some SICK game for which we are training?" He also believes Iraq will be a failure until the US Military decides to be as bold about taking civilian casualties as are the insurgents. He says it is a KNOWN fact that one military force CANNOT defeat an opposing force if they are LESS willing to take casualties than their opponent.
AWOL, DUI, 9/ll, Tom DeLay, Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo Bay Torture, Afghanistan, Iraq, Amrhamoff, The Indian Gaming Scandal, Halliburton's No-Bid Bonanza, Bob Ney, Mark Foley, Afghanistan's Missing $700 Million Turns Up in Iraq, The Pentagon-Israel Spy Case, Valerie Plame, Wiretapping the United Nations, The Boeing Boondoggle, Pundits on the Payroll: The Armstrong Williams Case, Ground Zero's Unsafe Air..........to name a select few
txshrampon, why don't you take that picture of the old, leathery, weather beaten woman off of your posts? It detracts from the objectivity of your arguments.
I wouldn't have near the problem I do with Bush, if he would just admit that the war in Iraq was a mistake. He went in on the "fact" that Iraq had wmd and to this day not ONE has been found.
Ground zero's unsafe air? Now you are really reaching Sheehan. So what did Bush do to cause that? I have heard that the night before 9/11 Bush ordered truckloads of asbestos spread throughout the buildings so that it would disperse after the planes hit the buildings. Is this the same theory that you are blaming him for?
Oh yeah, I forgot that one. Blood does run uphill. Did you hear about her webchat last nite? She said that her favorite movie is Casa Blanca and that while she was in college she watched it over and over and over until she could recite the lines. Only trouble is, they didn't have VCR's back then. And her mother named her after Sir Edmund Hillary, only problem is that Hillary was born a few years before Edmund Hillary climbed Everest. This piece of work is a pathological liar just like her husband in name only.
Guys, it doesn't matter that the screenshot of the headline came from Drudge -- which is at best a "selective" source, as I think we can all agree. The news -- that Bush's approval numbers are now at 28%, comparable to Nixon's at his lowest ebb -- is a fact, and is being reported by all legitimate news outlets in America. FYI. Now if we want to actually talk about that, or about WHY that is ...
Just pointing out the hypocricy of liberals. A few months back I argued that Drudge doesn't inject his opinion on his website that he only links to different news agencies and I caught hell because Drudge exposed Clinton getting his jollies with an intern and all the liberals think he posts only conservative news stories. Now that he posts Bush's poll numbers, they don't have anything negative to say about Drudge. Just pointing out how liberals want it both ways.
6:24, Ok, let's just for the sake of argument use this one. Do you approve of the President's handling of the war in Iraq? Pretty general don't you think. Now let's reword the question. Do you think the President could do a better job in Iraq by using more troops or less troops? You see, it's all in the wording of a poll as to how the media wants a result. Your welcome.
.jpg)
22 comments:
Oh, so now Drudge is a reliable news source, but when he exposed Bill Clinton as an adulterer he is a kook. Which one is it? I love the liberal mindset.
Clinton had his extra-curricular activity, but he will not be remebered as one of the worst presidents this country has ever seen!!!!!
Oh, yes he will. Remember Waco.
Waco, Monica, Khobar Towers, USS Cole, World Trade Center, Rhuwanda, Travelgate, FBI files, Whitewater, Yugoslavia.......
To anonyNOTHING 10:48...
Least we NOT forget adding to the list of Clinton failures the events leading up to the attack and murder on the 11th of September 2001 of nearly 3,000 United States CIVILIANS working WITHIN the United States.
************************************
Of course there will ALWAYS be those people who think it is FAR worse for 3,000 soldiers, marines, airmen and sailors to be killed during the course of nearly 4 years performing the job for which they VOLUNTEERED and were TRAINED than it is for CIVILIANS to be MURDERED going about their lives WITHIN the United States. In the MINDS of people who think this is CORRECT they feel JUSTIFIED in being pissed at President Bush.
In the words of MY brother a US Army, Lt. Col. serving his THIRD tour in Afghanistan, "What the hell is wrong with civilians? Do they think troops are issued automatic weapons the second week of training and shoot at targets shaped like humans because it is some SICK game for which we are training?" He also believes Iraq will be a failure until the US Military decides to be as bold about taking civilian casualties as are the insurgents. He says it is a KNOWN fact that one military force CANNOT defeat an opposing force if they are LESS willing to take casualties than their opponent.
AWOL, DUI, 9/ll, Tom DeLay, Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo Bay Torture, Afghanistan, Iraq, Amrhamoff, The Indian Gaming Scandal, Halliburton's No-Bid Bonanza, Bob Ney, Mark Foley, Afghanistan's Missing $700 Million Turns Up in Iraq, The Pentagon-Israel Spy Case, Valerie Plame, Wiretapping the United Nations, The Boeing Boondoggle, Pundits on the Payroll: The Armstrong Williams Case, Ground Zero's Unsafe Air..........to name a select few
txshrampon, why don't you take that picture of the old, leathery, weather beaten woman off of your posts? It detracts from the objectivity of your arguments.
I wouldn't have near the problem I do with Bush, if he would just admit that the war in Iraq was a mistake. He went in on the "fact" that Iraq had wmd and to this day not ONE has been found.
dear mzchief,
thank you
i think you get it.
Ground zero's unsafe air? Now you are really reaching Sheehan. So what did Bush do to cause that? I have heard that the night before 9/11 Bush ordered truckloads of asbestos spread throughout the buildings so that it would disperse after the planes hit the buildings. Is this the same theory that you are blaming him for?
Shut up SquareHead!!MzCreep!!!I declare Jihad on your big forehead!!!
Thanks for reminding me about one more of Clintons' scandals. I forgot about the no bid contracts that Halliburton recieved from Clinton also.
Don't forget that Hillary had Vince Foster murdered.
Oh yeah, I forgot that one. Blood does run uphill. Did you hear about her webchat last nite? She said that her favorite movie is Casa Blanca and that while she was in college she watched it over and over and over until she could recite the lines. Only trouble is, they didn't have VCR's back then. And her mother named her after Sir Edmund Hillary, only problem is that Hillary was born a few years before Edmund Hillary climbed Everest. This piece of work is a pathological liar just like her husband in name only.
Jump on in SHeehan
Juanita Brodderick, Paula Jones, and Jennifer Flowers.
Guys, it doesn't matter that the screenshot of the headline came from Drudge -- which is at best a "selective" source, as I think we can all agree. The news -- that Bush's approval numbers are now at 28%, comparable to Nixon's at his lowest ebb -- is a fact, and is being reported by all legitimate news outlets in America. FYI. Now if we want to actually talk about that, or about WHY that is ...
Just pointing out the hypocricy of liberals. A few months back I argued that Drudge doesn't inject his opinion on his website that he only links to different news agencies and I caught hell because Drudge exposed Clinton getting his jollies with an intern and all the liberals think he posts only conservative news stories. Now that he posts Bush's poll numbers, they don't have anything negative to say about Drudge. Just pointing out how liberals want it both ways.
Wouldn't it be great to see exactly what the question was used to come up with this poll number?
Anon 11:33PM
Take your pick!!! There are many that would get the same result!
6:24, Ok, let's just for the sake of argument use this one. Do you approve of the President's handling of the war in Iraq? Pretty general don't you think. Now let's reword the question. Do you think the President could do a better job in Iraq by using more troops or less troops? You see, it's all in the wording of a poll as to how the media wants a result. Your welcome.
I guess the media also looks in the phone book to see if you have an R or a D by your name, so they make sure and target the proper audiance.
Post a Comment