8.21.2006

9 Angry Women, 3 Angry Men (Jury Composition)

How long can this go on? You're telling me a jury can deliberate for a week and then suddenly say, "Hey, he's guilty. We don't have any reasonable doubt"?

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

He's a sneakey ass tapper . drug em and tap em . Just not my style . I wait till they ask me to TAP IT !

Anonymous said...

He should have been charged as being a religious sleezeball. Could have easily gotten a conviction. But when you have the quality of the accusers, you definitely have a problem. Even without testifying, I think he'll walk.

Anonymous said...

He was guilty on the first day but free lunches and $40.00 a day is hard to walk away from.

Anonymous said...

3:58 - ever served on a jury? Not everybody is thrilled about that, especially hearing graphic testimony.

Who chose the jury after all? A bunch of lawyers.

I'd have been angry too at some man of the cloth hiding behind that to have his way with a bunch of women. And they were just as sleezy as he was.

Anonymous said...

Poll on the fly.

Ass tappin bit.....funny or not funny .....discuss

funny but beginning to lose some luster

Anonymous said...

Actually lawyers do not choose the jury, they choose which persons do not sit on the jury. The folks left are those not chosen.

Anonymous said...

4:17 PM - they should try some cow tippin' for a while.

Anonymous said...

Oh I would like to TIP txsharons COW ! MOOWEE !

Anonymous said...

funny

Anonymous said...

Having sat on a jury, I believe that your mind can be changed to within a reasonable doubt of guilty or not guilty. Often another member will point out something that brings enlightment to the situation. I am not sure at what point I would say we are locked but I feel the jury members will know when they have exhausted all possibilities.

Collectionsite said...

It will be interesting to see who and what has kept the jury together this long? .. Any bets ... ?