I wonder if that's a random "past wreck in Decatur photo"...or the actual wreck.
Maybe an habitual drunken motorcycle driver. Hey, with the guy going to jail for a few years at least some random car full of cheerleaders, or a mom and baby, or whomever...may live to grow old.
I heard that it was a mother that was killed and she was expecting her second child. Her 5 yoa daughter was with her and I hear that shew was not injured too badly.
Anon at 2:55, exactly what is your agenda?
Bad deal,,,,,,,it is the actual wreck, the mother of the 5yoa did pass away as a result of the accident.
i see don munsch from the MESS
this was not a mother of a 5 yr old girl. this was a young adult woman, approx 17-19 years old. very sad deal!
We were in the ER after it happened and she had a 4 year old daughter in the car with her and she was 5 months pregnant. Don't talk about things you know nothing about.
anon 6:13, she had no children, I know that for a fact. maybe there was a small child there for something else.
Her mom works at Imperial, I know what I'm talking about.
She had a child and was 5 months pregnant, very sad.
you guys have two different wrecks confused! I'm not wasting my time arguing with yall! It will be in the paper & I guess yall will see you are wrong!
It is horrible however many people are involved and I am praying for the family.
anothe sad tradegy for wise county and for that family my thoughts and pryers go out to the family. as far as anon 2:55 i take offense to the maybe a drunken motorcycle driver. i hate to point it out but bikers those who do not ride crotch rockets ride safly usally sagfer than those who drive cars trucks etc and in two out of three wrecks involving bikers the drivers say they didnt see them and heres a link to the txdot web site to prove this http://www.dot.state.tx.us/trafficsafety/tv_radio/Radio/OTR%so before the comment Maybe an habitual drunken motorcycle driver. you should think that if hes a repeat offender that it would not matter what he was driving he should be called a drunk driver
well, according to the update, the dummy who claim to know it all and say the lady who lost her life did not have a child with her, or at all, and was not pregnant did not know what they were on here lying about.what a shame for liars and the family who lost a loved one.thanks WCM for keeping us informed.
Oh my gosh! Now we are relying on the WCM to keep us INFORMED? Really, though, a sad incident and we need to pray for the families involved.
i guess so. what other paper reported on this unfortunate accident? if you found it somewhere else, i missed it and would like to read it. please inform us. im a friend of the family.
My thoughts and prayers are with this family.
THE 5 YEAR OLD WAS THE WOMAN'S NIECE, AND SHE WAS PREGNANT. KNOW THE FACTS BEFORE OPENING YOUR MOUTHS.
I am amazed that people can argue over something this sensitive and base their claims on hearsay or the paper. Even the update had it wrong when I originally read it. They did later change it.
WOW! A pissing contest on a blog about who knows more about a subject that is NONE of their business! Class! Real Class!How do I know it is NONE of your business? If you were a family member and or close friend you'd be too busy consoling others who loved and lost the victim of the accident to worry about making certain you had tidbits to sate the morbid curiosity of "rubberneckers".
Post a Comment